Hi,
could you take a look as an AI expert at the following thesises:
Some short summary of that article:
Assuming you know about the
and the Mises economic calculation argument:
You can get the following ideas:
1. Central planning authorit is issuing a infinite sequence of the commands
use resources R1, R2 and execute method R1, R2 -> R3 to get
some amount of the resource R3.
2. R1, R2 and the performance value of the method R1, R2 -> R3 all are
the results of the inductive process of technical discovery and
problem solving. For example you have to estimate the quality of
lime to get the output of a process.
3. On market when you make such decisions amount of R1 and R2 is
limited by the budget of person or market organzation.
And the increase of such budget is dependent on the profit or loss
that is extracted from the market process if the physically based
money is used for loss/profit calculation.
4. Central authority in the case if the market process is missed
is using uncertain inductive results R1, R2, R3 and could not compare
output of its decisions to some objective values.
5. On market when you sell R3 the distribution of gold is changing in
the appropriate way. If R3 is a garbage you loss money.
6. If central authority is producing garbage R3 there is no way
to detect that. There is no way to test that.
Central banks are affected by that issue in the same way.
Please see attachments in Russian
Also there is an idea to use global correlators and massive RF
front ends to track people in the real economic and check
is the a-priory Solomonoff distribution exactly what is observed in
the real world.
Kirill Abramovich aka wieker
Samara, Russia
No comments:
Post a Comment