Elementary mathematics for future school teachers.
Let's review the following ideas.
We can assume that there is a digital photo that displays exactly the same scene at the same
time that you see with one of your eyes. (Let's assume that the second eye you lose
during the punishment after critical security issue were detected in your code)
There are a lot of possible programs that paint that digital photo exactly byte to byte,
bit to bit.
Some of them are large. Some of them are shorter.
We can assume that during your life you see a sequence of such frames (scenes). And each one
could be rendered by some programs.
This is the formal spec for a program for memoirs of every software engineer.
But this memoirs can be generated even for persons that are not software engineers.
And, of course, all possible fake memoirs could be generated in all possible ways for every
person on the Earth.
The set containing programs to generate all possible fake and real memoirs of all humans that are alive on Earth is the so called Solomonoff a-priory distribution (but Ancient Egypt and Greeks know about it also).
You know what memoir is real if you are talking about yourself.
How to check what is the real memoir of other persons?
There is simple way to do that.
The probability that this memoir is real is reverse proportional to the logarithm of its length.
Hmm. We need logarithm in the schools also.
So the most simple memoirs are most probable.
Also, trust only software that you wrote by yourself.
Because the most probable scenario that software that you get from other person
was written by monkeys. Idiotic monkeys.
That is the shocking reality.
The same is right about relay logic.
Use only relay logic.
The GNU FTP mirror is maintained by a few people with autism syndrome.
The Java maven repository is abandonware with a lot of dependencies that
are downloaded by almost infinite chains and could be compromised in a
lot of ways.
The Google Gemini AI personal information is hosted on GitHub.
And all that staff is used in the systems that operate trillions of dollars.
Stop to do that ppl.
Use relay logic, transistors, small discrete logic like 74HC04.
Also a lot of monkeys don't understand how to use money in a proper way.
But those who understand know that it is the only mean to communicate between
monkeys. Monkeys who don't understand money can not communicate at all.
That's so called Mises calculation argument.
It seems the minimum description length principle could be used to deduce minimum ethics. At least you can compare ethics by the length. What about the following question: how to shoot met-art girl in the dark underground?
at least we can ask a question: does russian met-art model from a pic want some money?
and what obstacles do that guess so hard?
why it is so hard to contact her directly?
she lose money, interesting person lose opportunity to make some photos.
Also the only way to obtain physical safety in the world where monkeys write
software is to have personal arsenals of assault rifles, grenades and quadcopters.
Also, don't trust literature. When someone trust without full proof by himself then
it results that criminal is heading to the authors. And add shit to the books.
Each school teacher has to write his own version and check all the proofs.
Each school teacher has to write his own version with all the proofs verified by himself.
So first tell ppl elementary mathematics and Solomonoff distribution. That tells
that every shit can happen. Because there are only monkeys around you.
Don't trust monkeys. That leads that criminal is starting to replace them.
And learn your students to check all proofs.
Also, if there are any questions about who send you that:
Kirill Abramovich
Samara, Russia
That's it.
Let's review the following ideas.
We can assume that there is a digital photo that displays exactly the same scene at the same
time that you see with one of your eyes. (Let's assume that the second eye you lose
during the punishment after critical security issue were detected in your code)
There are a lot of possible programs that paint that digital photo exactly byte to byte,
bit to bit.
Some of them are large. Some of them are shorter.
We can assume that during your life you see a sequence of such frames (scenes). And each one
could be rendered by some programs.
This is the formal spec for a program for memoirs of every software engineer.
But this memoirs can be generated even for persons that are not software engineers.
And, of course, all possible fake memoirs could be generated in all possible ways for every
person on the Earth.
The set containing programs to generate all possible fake and real memoirs of all humans that are alive on Earth is the so called Solomonoff a-priory distribution (but Ancient Egypt and Greeks know about it also).
You know what memoir is real if you are talking about yourself.
How to check what is the real memoir of other persons?
There is simple way to do that.
The probability that this memoir is real is reverse proportional to the logarithm of its length.
Hmm. We need logarithm in the schools also.
So the most simple memoirs are most probable.
Also, trust only software that you wrote by yourself.
Because the most probable scenario that software that you get from other person
was written by monkeys. Idiotic monkeys.
That is the shocking reality.
The same is right about relay logic.
Use only relay logic.
The GNU FTP mirror is maintained by a few people with autism syndrome.
The Java maven repository is abandonware with a lot of dependencies that
are downloaded by almost infinite chains and could be compromised in a
lot of ways.
The Google Gemini AI personal information is hosted on GitHub.
And all that staff is used in the systems that operate trillions of dollars.
Stop to do that ppl.
Use relay logic, transistors, small discrete logic like 74HC04.
Also a lot of monkeys don't understand how to use money in a proper way.
But those who understand know that it is the only mean to communicate between
monkeys. Monkeys who don't understand money can not communicate at all.
That's so called Mises calculation argument.
It seems the minimum description length principle could be used to deduce minimum ethics. At least you can compare ethics by the length. What about the following question: how to shoot met-art girl in the dark underground?
at least we can ask a question: does russian met-art model from a pic want some money?
and what obstacles do that guess so hard?
why it is so hard to contact her directly?
she lose money, interesting person lose opportunity to make some photos.
Also the only way to obtain physical safety in the world where monkeys write
software is to have personal arsenals of assault rifles, grenades and quadcopters.
Also, don't trust literature. When someone trust without full proof by himself then
it results that criminal is heading to the authors. And add shit to the books.
Each school teacher has to write his own version and check all the proofs.
Each school teacher has to write his own version with all the proofs verified by himself.
So first tell ppl elementary mathematics and Solomonoff distribution. That tells
that every shit can happen. Because there are only monkeys around you.
Don't trust monkeys. That leads that criminal is starting to replace them.
And learn your students to check all proofs.
Also, if there are any questions about who send you that:
Kirill Abramovich
Samara, Russia
That's it.
