Hi,
could you take a look as an AI expert at the following thesises:
https://transitional-writes.dreamwidth.org/45360.html
Some short summary of that article:
Assuming you know about the
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solomonoff's_theory_of_inductive_inference
and the Mises economic calculation argument:
https://mises.org/online-book/economic-calculation-socialist-commonwealth
You can get the following ideas:
1. Central planning authorit is issuing a infinite sequence of the commands
use resources R1, R2 and execute method R1, R2 -> R3 to get
some amount of the resource R3.
2. R1, R2 and the performance value of the method R1, R2 -> R3 all are
the results of the inductive process of technical discovery and
problem solving. For example you have to estimate the quality of
lime to get the output of a process.
3. On market when you make such decisions amount of R1 and R2 is
limited by the budget of person or market organzation.
And the increase of such budget is dependent on the profit or loss
that is extracted from the market process if the physically based
money is used for loss/profit calculation.
4. Central authority in the case if the market process is missed
is using uncertain inductive results R1, R2, R3 and could not compare
output of its decisions to some objective values.
5. On market when you sell R3 the distribution of gold is changing in
the appropriate way. If R3 is a garbage you loss money.
6. If central authority is producing garbage R3 there is no way
to detect that. There is no way to test that.
Central banks are affected by that issue in the same way.
Please see attachments in Russian
https://github.com/wieker/electrolyser/blob/master/docs/task3.pdf
Also there is an idea to use global correlators and massive RF
front ends to track people in the real economic and check
is the a-priory Solomonoff distribution exactly what is observed in
the real world.
Kirill Abramovich aka wieker
Samara, Russia
Also
BTW we have the way to estimate the complexity of the human brain at least for the simple processes.
fast speach.
the speed of neurons is 10-100 Hz
according to Wikipedia there are 86 000 000 000 neurons in the human brain.
86 Gneurons * 100Hz for fast speach. 10Tops
10 Tops is the performance of human brain.
And at least we can repeat that question.
What is the best basis to compress that structure?
What is the complexity of RF CMOS global correlators to sample and control that structure?
At least we can think about that. Assuming the physical possibility of such RF AFE.
that will be the cheapest RF CMOS correlator to sample and control human brain.
And we can assume that such AFE is achievable using the current RF CMOS process
1. Ultra length radio waves could penetrate thin electrolyte level.
2. Ultra small antennas could receive and emit such radio waves if impedance is matched.
3. Large antenna arrays are achievable through the current RF CMOS processes
4. 3G/LTE beam forming could be used to scan neurons group by group by high speed array of RF CMOS 100GHz comparators.
Could you send it to your students?
Don't forget about russian met-art models and korean KPOP singers.
https://transitional-writes.dreamwidth.org/44972.html
It seems the minimum description length principle could be used to deduce minimum ethics. At least you can compare ethics by the length. What about the following question: how to shoot met-art girl in the dark underground? ~2026-24709-41 (talk) 16:43, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
at least we can ask a question: does russian met-art model from a pic want some money?
and what obstacles do that guess so hard?
why it is so hard to contact her directly?
she lose money, interesting person lose opportunity to make some photos.