[replying back on the list]
I can't tell what the null -> freq -> null part of your top level flow does, but a stream with no throttle or hardware blocks can use up a lot of processor and make the system unresponsive.
My guess is that your processor is so busy doing nothing at a high rate that it doesn't have time to respond to the UI.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 7:54 PM Elmore Family <wa4ywm@comcast.net> wrote:
Jeff,Thanks for getting back to me.Attached are the 3 flowgraphs.JimFrom: Jeff LongSent: Monday, January 18, 2021 5:42 PMSubject: Re: Hierarchical blocks in a flowgraphHard to tell without seeing the flowgraph. Do you need a throttle?On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:31 PM Elmore's <wa4ywm@comcast.net> wrote:I have created a flowgraph which includes 2 hierarchical blocks which I created myself.The entire flowgraph is a transceiver. The hierarchical blocks are a receiver and transmitter.When I tested the hierarchical blocks separately, they function correctly. However, when I enable both in the top flowgraph, the flowgraph executes extremely slowly. It does not respond to clicks until perhaps as much as 30 seconds later.I tried taking one of the hierarchical blocks to the most basic level possible by simply using a Null Source and Sink. I still get the hang-up.Is there something I am not doing in the flowgraph to enable it to run with 2 blocks? Is there some sort of configuration I need to perform to get it to run?I have looked all over forums and in the docs but can't find anything to solve my problem.Thanks for any help.Jim
Virus-free. www.avg.com
No comments:
Post a Comment