"When responding to a thread from Discuss Gnuradio, be sure to include it as a CC or 'Reply All'."
Yup. When I received the daily digest today, I realized my mistake. My bad. (*waves at everyone*)
Thanks, Barry!
On 12/4/20 4:27 PM, Barry Duggan wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Thank you for your correction. We have updated https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/Quadrature_Demod and fixed the math rendering as well :)
>
> Also I have added your FM posts to https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/SuggestedReading#GNU_Radio_Specific
>
> You may be interested in https://pysdr.org/ in reference to your creating filters using Python code.
>
> Cheers!
> ---
> Barry Duggan KV4FV
> https://github.com/duggabe
>
> P.S. When responding to a thread from Discuss Gnuradio, be sure to include it as a CC or 'Reply All'.
>
> On 12/3/20 8:22 PM, Gary Schafer wrote:
>> Hi, Barry! (*waves*)
>>
>> That's great! Glad to help where I can! Can't tell you how much I appreciate GRC. I'm actually working on a SDR class based on it.
>>
>> With respect to the quad demod block documentation, the *text* that says, "the one-sample delayed input and the conjugate undelayed signal", should read "the one-sample delayed-&-conjugated input and the undelayed input signal". The delayed sample is also the one that is conjugated.
>>
>> FYI, the Tex code is correct.
>>
>> I was working on demodding NOAA APT signals for my next post (cuz that is a fun one) followed by a post on creating filters using Python code (the "tap" blocks). Do you have suggestions for other posts?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On 12/3/20 9:00 PM, Barry Duggan wrote:
>>> Hi Gary,
>>>
>>> You have some very interesting material there! I plan to include it in our https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/SuggestedReading list.
>>>
>>> In reference to the https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php/Quadrature_Demod block, what part do you think needs correcting? I work on the GNU Radio documentation and would like to make sure things are stated correctly.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
No comments:
Post a Comment