Please remember to reply to the mailing list!
Glad to hear it works.
I'd still recommend upgrading your Ubuntu version, it's ancient.
Cheers,
Marcus
On 13.11.20 15:03, Rupak Paul wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
> Thanks for your reply. I found out the error.
> I forgot to change the definition "test_001_t (self)" in the
> qa_square_ff.py file.
>
> Now it works fine and didn't need to change my OS or GNU version.
>
>
> Regards,
> Rupak
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 5:59 PM Marcus Müller <mmueller@gnuradio.org
> <mailto:mmueller@gnuradio.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi Rupak,
>
> can you update to a moderner Ubuntu? GNU Radio 3.8 should work with
> Ubuntu 16.04, indeed, but on 20.04, you can just
>
> sudo apt install gnuradio gnuradio-dev cmake swig
>
> and have a working GNU Radio 3.8 development environment, eradicating so
> many sources of error...
>
> Anyway, did you implement that test?
> Also, when you run `ctest --output-on-failure` instead of `make test`,
> you should be getting a more detailed error report.
>
> Best regards,
> Marcus
>
>
> On 12.11.20 04:02, Rupak Paul wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I am using Ubuntu 16.08 and GNU 3.8.
> > When I run ''make test'' cmd for creating new OOT module, it fails and
> > shows-
> > ......................................................................
> > Running tests...
> > Test project /home/rupak/gr-howto/build
> > Start 1: test_howto
> > 1/2 Test #1: test_howto ....................... Passed 0.02 sec
> > Start 2: qa_square_ff
> > 2/2 Test #2: qa_square_ff .....................***Failed 0.42 sec
> >
> > 50% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 2
> >
> > Total Test time (real) = 0.44 sec
> >
> > The following tests FAILED:
> > 2 - qa_square_ff (Failed)
> > Errors while running CTest
> > Makefile:127: recipe for target 'test' failed
> > make: *** [test] Error 8
> >
> ...............................................................................
> >
> > I followed every steps according to'OutOfTreeModules'.
> > How can I fix this issue?
> > --
> >
> >
> > Thanking you,
> >
> > Rupak Paul
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Thanking you,
>
> Rupak Paul
>
No comments:
Post a Comment