Re: multiply_vxx_const.set_k() in GR3.9 seems to be busticated?

A vector is what I want and this works flawlessly in GR3.9

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 7, 2020, at 12:57 AM, Ron Economos <w6rz@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Try the "Fast Multiply Constant" block instead. The "Multiply Constant" block requires that the constant be a vector.
>
> Ron
>
>> On 10/6/20 21:08, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
>> This is an apparent problem in 3.9.0.0-git
>>
>> In grc, create a multiply_const with a vector size > 1
>>
>> Have a function_probe block that sets the constant on a regular basis--perhaps from a variable, or a function call or the like.
>>
>> The constant will never be updated, even thought the function_probe setter is getting called. It's like the statement that contains the
>> muitiply_const_vxx.set_k() is never even getting evaluated, because if the value inside the set_k is itself a function call, that function
>> is never called.
>>
>> This caused me to pull my hair out (well, figuratively).
>>
>> Now the originating flow-graph .grc file originated from GR 3.7 but GRC 3.9 didn't appear to have any problem converting it and the
>> generated python looks entirely valid. This is almost like Python3 is simply quietly ignoring the entire statement and I cannot
>> understand why.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>