On 07/29/2019 12:30 PM, Ellie White wrote:
It looks like you're plotting the squares of the means, instead of the mean of the squares. Which will be very very different values.Hi Marcus,
If you look at lines 34 and 39, I think you will see that I did consider the values for y. I've reattached the program here in case I originally attached an older / incorrect version. Let me know if you still see a problem. Thanks!
E.
Computing the arithmetic mean of a series of voltage samples doesn't really give you anything useful, since they'll be (to a first approximation)
uniformly distributed around zero, with a slight DC offset in one direction or another.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:19 PM Marcus D. Leech <patchvonbraun@gmail.com> wrote:
On 07/29/2019 08:22 AM, Ellie White wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> Thanks for the interesting tidbit -- and yes, I'll be following your
> advice on using the integrated block for sure. And by the way -- I've
> got one more question on a similar theme as the previous one. I
> modified my flowgraph again (attached), and am now saving two data
> streams -- real and imaginary -- to two separate data files and
> processing them using the attached python program. In the python
> program, I am performing the same conversion as the Complex to Mag^2
> Block, but yet again I am getting different answers from what I expect
> (on the order of 10^-5 instead of ~0.01). Do you have any suggestions
> as to what could be causing the difference I am seeing? I am wondering
> if it has something to do with Python's handling of the different IO
> types, but could definitely be wrong on that. Any advice is much
> appreciated!
>
> Thanks Marcus! Take care,
> Ellie
>
Looks like your python program isn't squaring the real and imaginary
components -- the values for "y" are never considered in your program :)
No comments:
Post a Comment