Thank you for your prompt response.
I had a look at the datasheet of the new NUC
(https://www.intel.com/content/dam/support/us/en/documents/boardsandkits/NUC7i5BN_NUC7i7BN_TechProdSpec.pdf),
and it seems that it uses Intel I219V Ethernet controller rather than
82579LM as you mentioned.
I also looked at the datasheet of the old NUC which worked fine, and it
was using Intel I218-V Ethernet controller.
Does this mean the I219V is also bad as the 82579LM?
Ting
On 2018/07/27 12:00, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> On 07/26/2018 10:53 PM, Ting Wu wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have been using USRP N200 (with LFRX daughterboard) with an Intel
>> NUC (BOXNUC5I5RYH) for quite a long time, and everything has been
>> working well.
>>
>> Recently I purchased a new NUC of a recent version (BOXNUC7I5BNK),
>> and the overflow problem (printing D) occurred.
>>
>> So I made a test. I installed Ubuntu 17.10 on both the old and the
>> new NUCs, and installed exactly the same software. Then I tested
>> these two NUCs with the same USRP and confirmed that the overflow
>> problem only occurs with the new NUC.
>>
>> I made a simple script for the test as shown in the attached figure.
>> With the new NUC, the letter D is printed once in a while as shown
>> below:
>>
>> -----------------------------------Output--------------------------------------------
>>
>> linux; GNU C++ version 6.2.0 20161027; Boost_106200;
>> UHD_003.009.005-0-unknown
>>
>> -- Opening a USRP2/N-Series device...
>> -- Current recv frame size: 1472 bytes
>> -- Current send frame size: 1472 bytes
>> -- Detecting internal GPSDO.... Found an internal GPSDO:
>> Jackson-Labs, FireFly , Firmware Rev 0.929
>> -- Setting references to the internal GPSDO
>> 1532658018 3595
>> 1532658019 3362
>> 1532658020 2861
>> D1532658021 666
>> 1532658022 587
>> 1532658023 722
>> 1532658024 780
>> 1532658025 477
>> 1532658026 703
>> DD1532658027 759
>> 1532658028 553
>> 1532658029 618
>> 1532658030 581
>> 1532658031 474
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> With the old NUC, there is no overflow at all.
>>
>> So it seems the overflow problem is associated with the hardware of
>> the new NUC (BOXNUC7I5BNK). My question is that is there any method
>> to avoid this overflow problem? If I have to drop this new NUC, what
>> part of the NUC is causing this problem and what types of PCs may
>> have the same problem and I should avoid in the future?
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>> Ting Wu
> The Intel 82579LM Ethernet chip is known to have serious issues with
> dropping frames from time to time, and we've seen this type of behavior
> with 82579LM on motherboards.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
No comments:
Post a Comment