I don't understand your question.
..Fir is a means of using filters in digital domain while fft is an algorithm for implementing DFT...How can they be similar??
On 06-May-2017 1:24 AM, "GhostOp14" <ghostop14@gmail.com> wrote:
I actually think I figured it out. Results match now. I am still curious on anyone's thoughts on how "exact" the match is between FIR and FFT filtering in practice.---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ghost Op <ghostop14@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:31 PM
Subject: Frequency vs time domain Filtering Anomaly
To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.orgHi everyone,
I'm trying to sort out a discrepancy I'm seeing between a frequency domain and time domain version of the same filter. What I'm running into is that my frequency domain implementation is a match for the GNURadio response, however in the time-domain version, while the filter band looks the same, the frequency domain version seems to remove more of the out-of-band signal by about 35 dB.You can see it in the screenshot below:
In my experience with code my first assumption is I'm doing something wrong. But before I go on a bug hunt, I wanted to check with those of you who have worked with both time and frequency filters to see if my assumption that the two should be exact matches is accurate or if the result is as expected. My understanding is that applying the same filter in either the time or frequency domain should produce the same output, and this doesn't quite look "the same" enough to me. Does the forward/reverse FFT process in the frequency domain version cause some resolution/loss?Any thoughts?
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
No comments:
Post a Comment