Hi Ernest,
to be honest, yes, you probably could do that post-processing in GNU Radio, but it's offline processing and might be a lot easier to do just e.g. in python with numpy/scipy.
I also plan for NTP. But how do I simultaneously trigger recording with it.I don't know the HackRF interface very well, but I'd imagine it has some sort of "start" method or just a "first call to gimmesamples()". I'm afraid others will have to jump in here!
Best regards,
Marcus
On 25.08.2016 08:19, Ernest Matey wrote:
To line up the 3 recordings with the timestamps will be a post processing I guess on GNUradio??Thank you for the reply.Hi All,Sorry I replied on my other Post ( Nanoseconds). That was not intended.
I also plan for NTP. But how do I simultaneously trigger recording with it.
Ernest
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Marcus Müller <marcus.mueller@ettus.com> wrote:
Hi Ernest,
On 25.08.2016 07:07, Ernest Matey wrote:
> It is critical for me to start the recording simultaneously and
> synchronized to more than 100ms accuracy between the stations.
100ms is a whole different story than nanoseconds in your other post;
You could probably achieve this 0.1s accuracy by coordinating computer
clocks (NTP, PTP) and then triggering recording with those.
Anyway, since your hardware, as far as I know, doesn't allow for timing
control itself, doing exactly what Kevin recommended sounds clever:
you've inserted PPS signals in your sample stream, so use the very rough
PC-clock-aligned sampling start to give your "roughly aligned" streams,
and extract the PPS information from your recordings later on to fine-align.
Best regards,
Marcus
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
No comments:
Post a Comment