Indeed.
I updated the footer to point to the correct license and clarified that the logo is copyright Marcus. Obviously he has licensed it for purposes of this website. We had a brief conversation about it a few minutes ago in which I don't think we had an agreement on what the license for the logo should be.
I'll update again with a proper license statement for the logo once we have clarification on his intent.
-Nathan
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Marcus Müller <marcus.mueller@ettus.com> wrote:
As it happens, I designed that logo; it's not necessarily under the same license as the website.
Now I'm curious: what's your plan? What do you want to do with that logo?
Best regards,
Marcus
On 24.05.2016 21:38, Raj Bhattacharjea wrote:
The VOLK website claims it's contents are licensed under "Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 4.0 International", however, the license link actually takes you to the text of the "Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International".
These are different licenses and the difference is whether the license allows others to use the content for commercial purposes. I was trying to cite a copy of the VOLK logo when I came across this. I hope the VOLK website maintainer watches this list and clarifies which license the site is under.
--
Raj Bhattacharjea, PhDGeorgia Tech Research InstituteInformation and Communications Laboratory
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
No comments:
Post a Comment