that might actually be part of OpenSSL's CPU feature detection, be caught and handled normally; maybe it's hiding another fault. I assume when you type "continue" on the gdb prompt the program actually crashes with SIGSEGV?
Best regards,
Marcus
On 01.02.2016 18:54, Gabriel Pechiarovich wrote:
HiI used the backtrace and got this:
(gdb) run wifi_loopback_ngui.pyStarting program: /usr/bin/python wifi_loopback_ngui.py[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction._armv7_tick () at armv4cpuid.S:1717 mrc p15,0,r0,c9,c13,0(gdb) bt#0 _armv7_tick () at armv4cpuid.S:17#1 0xb48238a8 in OPENSSL_cpuid_setup () at armcap.c:75#2 0xb6fe70d4 in call_init (l=<optimized out>, argc=argc@entry=2,argv=argv@entry=0xbefffd64, env=env@entry=0xbefffd70) at dl-init.c:78#3 0xb6fe7230 in call_init (env=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>,argc=<optimized out>, l=<optimized out>) at dl-init.c:36#4 _dl_init (main_map=main_map@entry=0x1074500, argc=2, argv=0xbefffd64,env=0xbefffd70) at dl-init.c:126#5 0xb6febb2c in dl_open_worker (a=<optimized out>) at dl-open.c:566#6 0xb6fe6f80 in _dl_catch_error (objname=0xb6ffa510,objname@entry=0xbefdd32c, errstring=0xbefdd3c0,errstring@entry=0xbefdd330, mallocedp=0xbefdd32c,mallocedp@entry=0xbefdd32b, operate=0xbefdd330, args=args@entry=0xbefdd334)at dl-error.c:187#7 0xb6feb1d0 in _dl_open (file=0xbefdd86c "/usr/lib/python2.7/lib-dynload/_hashlib.so",mode=-2147483646, caller_dlopen=0xb6f444a4 <_PyImport_GetDynLoadFunc+324>,nsid=-2, argc=2, argv=0xbefffd64, env=0xbefffd70) at dl-open.c:650#8 0xb6cebb9c in dlopen_doit (a=0xbefdd580) at dlopen.c:66#9 0xb6fe6f80 in _dl_catch_error (objname=0xb6ffa510, errstring=0x0,mallocedp=0xa91f4, operate=0xa91f8, args=0xbefdd580) at dl-error.c:187#10 0xb6cec2ac in _dlerror_run (operate=0xb6cebb20 <dlopen_doit>,args=args@entry=0xbefdd580) at dlerror.c:163---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
I'm not a programer but i can understand some things.The modifications i've made to the loopback are basicaly changing all the gui
2016-02-01 11:49 GMT-05:00 Bastian Bloessl <bloessl@ccs-labs.org>:
Hi,
if you don't have another USRP that works with a PC (like B210 or N210) and really have to get it running on the E310 you should do a backtrace.
It's hard to tell what's going wrong from just the fact that something segfaults.
Best,Bastian
--Dipl.-Inform. Bastian Bloessl
Distributed Embedded Systems GroupUniversity of Paderborn, Germany
On 01 Feb 2016, at 08:37, Gabriel Pechiarovich <gaps.18.2008@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,I installed the module by coping the files needed to the E310 then I compiled them on the E310, the needed libraries like itpp were downloaded and copied as well.I've installed in this order (install using cmake make ...): ITPP 4.3.1 gr-foo-master gr-ieee802-11-masterI wanted to run the ieee802 in this device since i cant run it on the USRP1 and i want to see the spectrum with an analyzer, so i can compare with a standard wifi transmitter.I'm running the third image of the E310.
2016-01-29 14:01 GMT-05:00 Bastian Bloessl <bloessl@ccs-labs.org>:
Hi,
On 29 Jan 2016, at 10:16, Gabriel Pechiarovich <gaps.18.2008@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all, I just installed this module in my E310, to run the loopback in the E310 i modified the flow graph so it is no gui, but when i'm running in the E310 i got a segmentation fault and the program stops:
How did you install the module? Did you compile it on the E310?
root@ettus-e300:~/wifi-master# python wifi_loopback_ngui.pylinux; GNU C++ version 4.9.1; Boost_105600; UHD_003.008.005-0-unknown
Using Volk machine: neon_hardfpOFDM MAPPER: encoding: 0set_min_output_buffer on block 10 to 96000set_min_output_buffer on block 12 to 96000set_min_output_buffer on block 14 to 96000set_min_output_buffer on block 15 to 96000Segmentation faultroot@ettus-e300:~/wifi-master#
I think you should try to get a backtrace. I use something like
gdb pythonrun wifi_loopback.py<wait for crash>bt
I need to run at least the loopbackthank you in andvance
If you are interested in simulations only, there is really no need to run them on the E310.
Best,Bastian
--
Gabriel Pechiarovich SalasRed Dragon GamesDesigners and game developers
--
Gabriel Pechiarovich SalasRed Dragon GamesDesigners and game developers
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
No comments:
Post a Comment