Daer Marcus,
Thank you for your detailed answer. Now I feel I am getting to it... But, not fully, yet :)What I've said 'one' in the previous post is, you can understand with the figure:
http://i.imgur.com/QG5uryH.png
http://i.imgur.com/QG5uryH.png
I've posted the same figure in another thread some days ago.
Anyway, 'one' I meant is, the total sum of percent runtime. That is one and should be.
Regards,
Jeon.
2015-08-27 2:09 GMT+09:00 Marcus Müller <marcus.mueller@ettus.com>:
Hi Jeon,
But I don't think that GNU Radio uses 100 percent (= one) of CPU capability.Well, that obviously depends on what you do with GNU Radio.
Generally, GNU Radio scales pretty well, so I'm going to reply with:
GNU Radio tries to consume as much CPU as possible. There's limiting factors, mainly RAM access and IO that limit how much CPU can get consumed.
As you seem to be running a receiver: There's the upper limit on how much CPU can get used of samples coming in. You can only process as much signal as there is. Also, things that are out of the scope of the GNU Radio process tend to play an important rule here: The kernel has to talk to your radio hardware, etc.
I'm not quite sure what you refer to with "one"; do you mean the 1 that tools like "top" would display (namely: one fully occupied CPU core according to a more or less useful statistic; single processes can in that metric actually have CPU loads > 1)?
In order to calculate runtime usage of each block, therefore, it can be done by multiplying usage of GNU Radio process.No. GNU Radio is a heavily multi-threaded architecture, so each block runs in its own thread. Assuming you have a multi-core CPU, multiple threads will run at once; one core of your CPU might be 100% occupied by the GNU Radio block thread(s) running on it, whereas another is only 80% busy etc. This does not allow direct mapping of "percentage of CPU load" to actual time.
However, the performance counters offer exactly what you seem to need: The percentages your looking at are computed from the microseconds that each block spends in its work function. So just look at these total times.
I think it would be interesting to hear what you want to do, maybe we have an idea how to measure what is of interest to you.
Best regards,
Marcus
No comments:
Post a Comment