On 03/28/2015 10:56 AM, jmfriedt wrote:
> well I have been *extremely* lucky then because I have been running 48 hours of monitoring GPS
> signals by recording one second every 5 minutes (http://jmfriedt.sequanux.org/gps.avi, X axis
> is the PRN number and Y axis is the frequency offset) and have not lost a single dataset, while all my
> attempts for about a week at locking the R820T on a 1.57 GHz synthesizer (-35 dBm connected
> directly to the antenna input of the dongle) have yielded either total lack of PLL locking
> or a PLL locking for a second at best. I suspect a subtle timing issue (graphical display
> of the WxGUI FFT ?) of gr-companion wrt rtl_sdr but have unfortunately not been able to
> locate the issue.
>
> I also wonder then why the osmosdr web page cites the R820T as operating up to 1776 MHz
> (http://sdr.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/rtl-sdr) when the datasheet mentions a 1 GHz upper limit.
>
> I should mention that the above statement has been tested on a random sampling of all 10 dongles
> I have bought for teaching, and conclusions have held reliably whichever peripheral was used
> (all bought from the same supplier, probably same batch, all running the same R820T frontend, all
> with the same very poor 60-80 ppm offset).
>
> Thanks for the reply, JM
So, if you just use something like
osmocom_fft -f 1575.420e6 -g 30
And feed it a low-level signal-generator CW signal, you're saying that
it doesn't work?
>>> As a quick followup to my previous post, I confirm that the R820T is well suited for GPS
>>> signal decoding. I was not expecting the huge frequency offset (> 100 kHz at 1.57 GHz) and
>>> was not searching far enough from the expected carrier frequency during the acquisition phase.
>>> However these results were acquired by runnig rtl_sdr -s ... -f ... while gnuradio-companion
>>> running gr-osmosdr is unable to lock at 1.57 GHz and barely locks (for a few seconds !) at
>>> 1.56 GHz. I have analyzed the various version of librtlsdr (used by rtl_sdr and by gr-oscmocom)
>>> as well as the set_frequency functions and am unable to track any difference between the two
>>> codes (so far).
>>>
>>> JM
>>>
>> The R820T is generally flaky above about 1550MHz. Maybe in your
>> rtl_sdr tests, you just got lucky.
>>
>> gr-osmosdr uses the *SAME* underlying library as rtl_sdr, and at the
>> level of Gnu Radio, all of the low-level stuff like
>> "is the PLL locked" is utterly invisible to the Gnu Radio layer.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
No comments:
Post a Comment