Hello Rich,
although Ed commented on the latency issue, regarding your performance issue my 2 pence: From my experience, using a time domain equalizer with 100 taps is a huge computational burden. Imagine: You are expecting significant echos (to be equalized) of 100*4/250kHz=1,6 ms. I do not know your application, but for wireless this is a whole lot.
BTW: I am about to use exactly your computer USRP setup.
Best regards
Stephan Ludwig
Robert Bosch GmbH
Corporate Sector Research & Advance Engineering, Communication Technology (CR/AEH4)
Renningen
70465 Stuttgart
GERMANY
www.bosch.com
Tel. +49(711)811-8809
Fax +49(711)811-1052
Mobile +49(172)5630639
Stephan.Ludwig2@de.bosch.com
Registered Office: Stuttgart, Registration Court: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 14000;
Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Franz Fehrenbach; Managing Directors: Dr. Volkmar Denner,
Dr. Stefan Asenkerschbaumer, Dr. Rolf Bulander, Dr. Stefan Hartung, Dr. Dirk Hoheisel, Christoph Kübel,
Uwe Raschke, Wolf-Henning Scheider, Dr. Werner Struth, Peter TyrollerVon: discuss-gnuradio-bounces+stephan.ludwig2=de.bosch.com@gnu.org [mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+stephan.ludwig2=de.bosch.com@gnu.org] Im Auftrag von Richard Bell
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2015 00:45
An: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Betreff: [Discuss-gnuradio] QPSK Receiver and Processing Power
Hello all,
My question is, looking at my receiver flowgraph, would you think this design should push the limits of a good laptop? Would you believe I could be constrained to near the lowest sample rate limit with this design?
Laptop Specs: HP Elitebook 8570w, Core i7, 16 GB RAM, Ubuntu 14.04
I would be interested in hearing what sample rates other peoples QPSK radios run at with a USRP N210 and similar computer.
Thanks,
Rich
Read the mailing list of the GNU project right here! The information here is regarding the GNU radio project for USRP radios.
Thursday, February 19, 2015
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] QPSK Receiver and Processing Power
Thanks Stephan, that was a very good point to make. I have reduce the number of taps in my equalizer.
Unfortunately, this hasn't fixed the issue I spoke of (surprisingly). I am seeing dropped packets at sample rates of 200k, on and off, and HUGE latency between making a change at the transmitter and seeing it at the receiver. I am beginning to suspect an underlying network issue. My setup is an old cheap gigabit switch which connects two N210's to my laptop. I think something in that domain isn't performing as it should. I will dig further.v/r,
RichOn Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Ludwig Stephan (CR/AEH4) <Stephan.Ludwig2@de.bosch.com> wrote:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment