Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] QPSK Receiver and Processing Power

Hello Rich,

 

although Ed commented on the latency issue, regarding your performance issue my 2 pence: From my experience, using a time domain equalizer with 100 taps is a huge computational burden. Imagine: You are expecting significant echos (to be equalized) of 100*4/250kHz=1,6 ms. I do not know your application, but for wireless this is a whole lot.

 

BTW: I am about to use exactly your computer USRP setup.

 

Best regards

Stephan Ludwig

Robert Bosch GmbH
Corporate Sector Research & Advance Engineering, Communication Technology (CR/AEH4)
Renningen
70465 Stuttgart
GERMANY
www.bosch.com

Tel. +49(711)811-8809
Fax +49(711)811-1052
Mobile +49(172)5630639
Stephan.Ludwig2@de.bosch.com

Registered Office: Stuttgart, Registration Court: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 14000;
Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Franz Fehrenbach; Managing Directors: Dr. Volkmar Denner,
Dr. Stefan Asenkerschbaumer, Dr. Rolf Bulander, Dr. Stefan Hartung, Dr. Dirk Hoheisel, Christoph Kübel,
Uwe Raschke, Wolf-Henning Scheider, Dr. Werner Struth, Peter Tyroller

Von: discuss-gnuradio-bounces+stephan.ludwig2=de.bosch.com@gnu.org [mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+stephan.ludwig2=de.bosch.com@gnu.org] Im Auftrag von Richard Bell
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2015 00:45
An: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Betreff: [Discuss-gnuradio] QPSK Receiver and Processing Power

 

Hello all,

My question is, looking at my receiver flowgraph, would you think this design should push the limits of a good laptop? Would you believe I could be constrained to near the lowest sample rate limit with this design?

Laptop Specs: HP Elitebook 8570w, Core i7, 16 GB RAM, Ubuntu 14.04

 

I would be interested in hearing what sample rates other peoples QPSK radios run at with a USRP N210 and similar computer.

Thanks,
Rich