>> George,
>>
>> I do think we need something like what you have suggested but I am still
>> a bit puzzled about the right way of implementing it.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Andre
>>
> I think a more fundamental issue is that "carrier sense" isn't actually
> defined in any kind of general way. Certainly for *some* types of
> PHYs, you can do simple energy-presence detection. But usually, it's
> more complicated than that, and it varies widely from PHY to
> PHY. In some, you'll need to run a correlator before you even know
> whether the channel is busy or not. In others, simple energy
> detection works.
>
> I don't think there's a general-purpose way of doing this, but that's
> just my POV.
You're absolutely right, Marcus. I also think it'd be quite difficult to
find a truly general-purpose solution to that.
Knowing George's field of interested, I was assuming something like a
simple energy detector. I think even this simple example shows the
difficulties quite clearly.
-Andre
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
No comments:
Post a Comment