Thursday, May 26, 2011

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] To implement WiMAX with GnuRadio or not?

On May 25, 2011, at 6:23 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> Actually, IANAL is a perfectly-valid response. IP licensing arrangements are complicated and studded with sinkholes and minefields.

Yes; exactly. Think of it this way: If we don't put "IANAL, TINLA" then one could possibly, if IMHO unreasonably, interpret what we write as legal advice and thus we could possibly even be held liable for the advice. Although putting in that text does not entirely protect us, it makes the context clear that -this is not legal advice- and should not be interpreted to be so; it is just a discussion of legal issues, and may simply be people's opinions that wouldn't hold water in a court of law. It's sort of like the "CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE" many professional organizations require their employees to use when sending emails -- it cannot legally be enforced, but without it the organization could actually be liable for its contents (IIRC, WIRED did a piece on this issue in the last year, and this was their conclusion). And, no, I'm not kidding: in the litigious US society, these non-legally binding annoyances are actually necessary to CYOA.

> I've avoided the issue (I hope!) in my proprietary "stuff" that uses Gnu Radio by doing two things:
>
> o minimizing the "stuff" that I do inside the flow-graph if I can conveniently do it outside
> o speaking to the flowgraph via named pipes and moving the proprietary and user-goop into non Gnu Radio compiled
> code.

That sounds like the correct way to go in order to keep your code separate from GNU Radio's, but, of course, TINLA etc. ;)

It would be great if you could share with the list example code snippets of how you do the pipes. For example: Where in an online repository one can find such code.

I think that's what Jeff was getting at: that "we" are providing IANAL advice rather than code examples. I, for one, have never actually tried the pipes -- I've just heard that they are possible and that using them does not form a "greater work" in the GPL sense. - MLD


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

No comments:

Post a Comment