Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Transmitter type acceptance?

Getting type acceptance on an exposed-to-end-user SDR platform would
be extremely costly and diifficult and rife with heartburn and ulcers.

That's my impression based on watching the FCC over the years

--
Principal Investigator
Shirleys Bay Radio
Astronomy Consortium
http://www.sbrac.org

On Oct 2, 2010, at 5:49 PM, Justin Kelly <freefuel@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've been following this list for about a year, my primary interest
> was in applications for Amateur radio.
>
> My reason for this posting is in response to Tom's inquiry about
> White space usage.
>
> To my understanding Ettus research hardware is intended for use only
> as a laboratory instrument, There are very specific rules regarding
> intentional radiators.
>
> What is the general consensus for getting the transmitters type
> accepted?
>
> Justin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio