> Running an FFT is a CPU intensive application, and not a bandwidth/IO
> restricted application. The comparison made here is likely not an accurate
> representation of throughput if only data stream to disk is the goal.
>
> ~Jeff
FFT's are actually pretty cheap to calculate (profile it; they usually
aren't a huge consumer of resources unless you're running very large
FFTs).
Tom
>> I run Gnu Radio on an Atom D510 system for narrow-bandwidth radiometry.
>>
>> No way in heck are you going to be able to run at 25Msps for even a
>> *single* USRP2, let alone multiple ones.
>> I tried a 25Msps usrp2_fft.py on my atom D510 system (which is
>> dual-core at 1.6GHz), and it couldn't keep
>> up.
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
No comments:
Post a Comment