of the two usrp devices. Try increasing the rate so the symbols are
wider spectrally to make up for the offset. I believe that its the -r
option.
Hope that helps,
-Josh
On 05/18/2010 06:54 PM, Fisheep wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have currently set up a transmission between USRP1 and USRP2 with FLEX900.
> And got the following results.
>
> In gnuradio/gnuradio-example/python/digital/
> Successful transmission (ok = True) when
> Tx (USRP1) : ./benchmark_tx2.py -f 900M --tx-amplitude=0.4 -m dbpsk2
> Rx (USRP2) : ./benchmark_rx2.py -f 900M -m dbpsk2 -e eth0
> Fail (ok = False and lost lots of packets) when
> Tx (USRP2) : ./benchmark_tx2.py -f 900M --tx-amplitude=0.4 -m dbpsk2 -e
> eth0
> Rx (USRP1) : ./benchmark_rx2.py -f 900M -m dbpsk2
>
> In addition, if using the original modulation like dbpsk not dbpsk2, the
> transmission also not work as expected.
>
> also ref to the two discussions:
> http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/203035
> http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/202105
>
> I successfully transmit packet from USRP1 to USRP2 with the following
> parameter setting.
> Tx (USRP1) : benchmark_ofdm_new_tx.py -f 900M --tx-amplitude=0.4 -i 128
> Rx (USRP2) : benchmakr_ofdm_new_rx.py -f 900M -d 100
> But the same problem as above, USRP1 can't receive correct packet from
> USRP2.
>
> Does anyone has any suggection about this problem, please let me known,
> Thanks.
>
> Sincerely,
> Fisheep
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
No comments:
Post a Comment